tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-45828217067311189.post3581060519269243434..comments2023-09-29T12:44:34.834-04:00Comments on How Conservatives Drove Me Away: Is Google “Protecting” You From Exposure to Opposing Views?James Sinclairhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10213045233649924060noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-45828217067311189.post-48926069146810391612011-06-26T22:48:18.781-04:002011-06-26T22:48:18.781-04:00You should be proud of yourself for publishing evi...You should be proud of yourself for publishing evidence that disproved your hypothesis. Not enough people are humble enough to admit when they were wrong, but this shows you think truth is more important than ratifying your political views.<br /><br />*Subscribed*Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-45828217067311189.post-69346348643497056602011-06-20T15:21:26.623-04:002011-06-20T15:21:26.623-04:00What, "being careful to only go to..."? ...What, "being careful to only go to..."? Bah! There's nothing wrong with a split infinitive. (Although, I agree that there's room for improvement. But after trying and failing multiple times to fluidly construct that sentence I was about to completely drive myself crazy, and eventually I had to just give up.)James Sinclairhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10213045233649924060noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-45828217067311189.post-76400143481678127752011-06-20T14:42:34.947-04:002011-06-20T14:42:34.947-04:00with the exception of a single split infinitive, s...with the exception of a single split infinitive, spectacularly written. alec baldwin is so witty and reactionary right?Jim Lohmarhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15044246643685291835noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-45828217067311189.post-28154091017983338202011-06-17T13:11:46.627-04:002011-06-17T13:11:46.627-04:00You're right, the third one was supposed to be...You're right, the third one was supposed to be 6-to-1, not 7-to-1. I don't know how to feel about the fact that you managed to find a typo in a set of entirely made-up numbers, but I'm going to go with impressed.James Sinclairhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10213045233649924060noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-45828217067311189.post-4652323408908857622011-06-17T12:33:52.504-04:002011-06-17T12:33:52.504-04:00that leave a 1:49 ish chance of something else? o...that leave a 1:49 ish chance of something else? or are these some sort of confused house odds not meant to add up 100 %? Of course there's probably a non zero probability that I have forgotten how math works.<br /><br />-JordanAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com